The Italian League is Weird. Here's Why



¿Cuál es la mejor formación? Descargue la hoja de cálculo completa: ¡Gracias por su apoyo! La formación que elige un equipo para jugar se está convirtiendo en un tema del que se habla cada vez más en el mundo del fútbol. La forma en que un entrenador coloca a sus 11 jugadores en el campo aparentemente puede tener un gran impacto en el rendimiento de un equipo, pero ¿cuánto importa realmente? Bueno, para el video de hoy vamos a echar un vistazo a las estadísticas detrás de todas las formaciones utilizadas en la Premier League, Bundesliga, La Liga, Serie A y Ligue 1 para que podamos responder oficialmente a la pregunta: ¿Cuál es la mejor formación? En lo que va de temporada, 19 formaciones diferentes han aparecido en las 5 mejores ligas de Europa, y algunos entrenadores eligieron cambiar su formación cada semana, como Augsburgo en Alemania, que usó 7 formaciones diferentes en sus primeros 8 partidos de la temporada. Las formaciones han variado desde el clásico 4-3-3 hasta sistemas bastante modernos como el 3-2-4-1. Pero, ¿qué formación es la más popular? Si disfrutaste este video por favor deja un me gusta y suscríbete para más! __________________________________________________________________________________ SIGA ESTAS PÁGINAS IMPRESIONANTES INSTAGRAM: PATREON: NFT’S: MÚSICA: TWITTER: __________________________________________________________________________________

Comprar camisetas de Japón baratas maillots de foot pas cher.net,maillot bayern de munich 2017,le plus beau maillot du psg,nouveau maillot barcelone 2017 prix,numero maillot zidane juventus

50 comentarios

  1. Could you explain how do you define the lining formation?
    My team in Brasil, Palmeiras, plays different styles in the same game, I.e. when having the ball it is a type of 3124 and without the ball is 5131 but it depends a lot

  2. My opinion is that the prevalence of the 352 in Italy is down to a significantly higher emphasis on tactics and adaptability, as well as an appreciation of cantennacio.

    The 352 creates defensive stability by forming with three central defenders to occupy attackers, with wingbacks trained to determine when to defend and when to attack. The wingbacks are usually the critical component of a successful 352, as they’re asked to be both fullbacks and wingers.

    The three-man midfield facilitates two central banks of three for attackers to break down, but can then shift to support forwards

    I often see a deep-lying forward (often even a typical winger) playing off a central striker in order to link midfield and attack, while the full-backs shuttle up the flanks

    I personally love the formation, and it seems so well-suited to Serie A, though not everywhere else, which is certainly curious

  3. I started with a 442, tried a 433, switched to a 4231 last season, then a 3142 this season…high school level…just all depends on skill and ability of my players…be willing to adapt…

  4. Might be worth adding the average league position of the teams who use the formations…e.g better team use 4-2-3-1 for example as or 3 2-4-1 as they are more confident in their ability to score and not concede, or that they are willing to sacrifice defensive stability in favor of goal scoring opportunities.

  5. How do you determine the difference between a 4-4-1-1, 4-2-2-2 and a 4-4-2, come on. How do you even make stats off of these minor differences?

  6. This is an interesting analysis, in my opinion there are (surprisingly) no ultra defensive teams in serie a this year, even the sides from serie b seem to be trying to play their own brand of football instead of just sitting back and hoping for counter attacks. This seems to be a trend in Italy, evidenced by newly promoted sides in previous years like Empoli, Venezia and Spezia. And on top of that the teams who play negative "catenaccio" football like Genoa were recently relegated.

  7. Really enjoying learning about basic characteristics of each formation and what differences occur due to unique managerial/player types.

    Would it be possible to do a video on the 3331/3313 formation. This is a system that seems to have very little information available in comparison to more popular styles. 🙂

  8. The 352 is the most versatile scheme. It allows players to rotate pretty efficiently and occupy all areas of the pitch. A tacticaly minded league like serie A likes it for this reason, it's flexible, you can adapt to the opponent withou changing the overall scheme.
    It may be a difensive scheme but it can also be extremely offensive, take Inter and Atalanta as an example, so I donato think it is user in Italy necause of difensive attitude.
    Please nota that this attitude is changing a lot and Italian football is adapting to a more offensive attitude.

  9. Can you do a video on Van Bronckhorsts tactics. Rangers are going through a bad spell at the moment and all we’re hearing from the fans is “I don’t know what he’s trying to do.” It might be a hot potato in the comments section 😂

  10. can we consider the most dangerous formation to the formation that small teams play against top teams, I mean high winrate formation that has been used from lower when they are facing top teams, and that means this information is dangerous to play against for the top teams, and we can consider the opposite with "what is the highest formation's winrate that top teams use against low teams

  11. How do you define what formation a team is using? There is an ultra-thin line between a 4-3-3 and a 4-5-1, or between a line of 3 defenders and a line of 5. Furthermore, there is a huge difference between what a manager plans and what actually happens on the pitch, such as wingers helping de fullbacks close to their box, or defensive midfielders joining the atack as a second stricker. Also usually you have asymmetric formations that are hard to define (e.g. an attacking right fullback joins the midfield, almost as a winger, while a more defensive-minded left fullback stays back, turning a 4-3-3 into a 3-4-3 when in possession)

  12. As far as success and winning percentage goes, have you considered that the best teams tend to play certain systems, and not that the systems make the teams the best? Perform a causality test to see if the worst teams play certain systems because they need to maximize results, with a 442 being their most viable tactic (i.e. burnley and west brom in years past, bottom laliga teams)

  13. 3 men defence is very common in Italy…

    Conte set the new trend with Juventus and brought it to England during his tenure in Chelsea. But his approach is way more simple than what it meets the eye. Compact defence, tight defensive lines, low pressure and lightning counterattack.

    Gasperini and Juric are far more dynamic in their offensive approach than Conte, and rely on high and intense pressing, as well as man marking in open spaces. Sottil style is also an offspring of Gasperini.

    Mazzarri, the first italian tactician to trademark 3-5-2, plays like Conte.

    Anyway, formations change during the games, according to the phase…

  14. 433 has and always will be my favorite formation. So versitile, so dynamic, and unpredictable

    A defender shielding the defence with two free 8s being able to take up attacking roles creating a 3-2-5 in attack. And 4-4-2 in defence

  15. Your stat about Italian league being the lowest-scoring league is false it's actually the league with most goals per game in recent time:

    Stat from 2021-2022 season:

    Total goals scored

    Serie A: 1089
    Premier League: 1071
    Ligue 1: 1067
    Bundesliga: 954
    La liga: 951

  16. Nice descriptives to understand the leagues! However, little can be said here about causality. There is a huge confounding variable here. 4-3-3 is often the most favoured playing style by top contenders in a league. So then naturally the statistics will gear towards high performance for that playing style.

  17. The 3-5-2 line up is an very nice lineup cause it brings you many diffrent formations. to play in this line up i don’t understand why is this no an good line up

  18. I still like 4-3-3 and I would say it is my favourite for sure, you have good attack with to wingers and a good striker, and at the back the security of having 4 defences with a right back and a left back allowing the team to have some backup in the attack like Valencia does with Gayà and Lato in the left and Thierry Correia in the right.

  19. The formation as we know it is nothing more than a view of the team's XI. It all depends on the tactics and the way that players are used. For example, let's take the 4-3-3. In offence, it can be a 2-3-5 or 3-2-5, it can be 4-1-4-1 if the wingers get back in line with the two cm, it can be a 4-5-1 if the wingers get in straight line with the two cm and the cdm, it can be a 3-4-3 if the cdm becomes a third cb, it can be a 4-2-3-1 if one cm plays higher like a cam or it can be a 4-4-2 (or 4-2-4) if he plays even higher (of course there are a lot of other ways that those formations can be seen).
    So for me, the most dangerous formation is the one that your players can fit into.

  20. I wished if you illustrated these statistics with the addition of home and away because it could facilitate if it was used attackingly or defensively as you know a formation like 352 could have a variety of shapes based on the roles of the wingers

Los comentarios están cerrados.